Skip to content

Conversation

@chargome
Copy link
Member

@chargome chargome self-assigned this Jun 18, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Messages
📖 Do not forget to update Sentry-docs with your feature once the pull request gets approved.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against c7d1408

Copy link
Member

@andreiborza andreiborza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed on slack, I'm wondering if we want to actually default the tunnel route option to true. Maybe setting it to true is okay if we mention that they should also switch to an allow list for routes that should be handled by the middleware.

@chargome
Copy link
Member Author

I'd first test this option within our own apps before making it the default within the wizard 👍

Copy link
Member

@Lms24 Lms24 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR doesn't actually change the default value of the wizard, right? It just changes that if users opt into tunneling, they get the randomized route.
Just asking because we shouldn't default to tunneling due to it potentially heavily increasing traffic on Vercel and therefore cost for users. IIRC the wizard mentions this when it asks users if they want tunneling.

@chargome
Copy link
Member Author

The risk of breaking apps that use turbopack is too high here as we cannot automatically add matchers for random routes in turbopack.

@chargome chargome closed this Nov 21, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (f0fdb52) to head (c7d1408).
⚠️ Report is 94 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #1011       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   27.98%       0   -27.99%     
==========================================
  Files         130       0      -130     
  Lines       14233       0    -14233     
  Branches      882       0      -882     
==========================================
- Hits         3983       0     -3983     
+ Misses      10233       0    -10233     
+ Partials       17       0       -17     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants